The SUV Takeover - How Sedans Lost Their Crown in the American Car Market?

Image from Lexus

For decades, the sedan was the undisputed king of American roads. From the family-hauling Ford Taurus to the sporty Honda Civic, these four-door staples were synonymous with practical, affordable, and stylish transportation. But take a look around today, and you'll notice a dramatically different landscape. The once-dominant sedan has been largely dethroned, replaced by an ever-growing army of SUVs and crossovers. What happened? And where does this leave traditional sedans in a market obsessed with utility?

The Rise of the Crossover: A Perfect Storm of Practicality and Perception

The shift didn't happen overnight, but it gained significant momentum over the last decade. The video accurately points out that a key factor was the emergence of the "crossover" – essentially an SUV built on a car platform. This innovation was a game-changer because it offered many of the perceived benefits of a traditional SUV without the traditional drawbacks.

• Higher Driving Position: This is perhaps the most cited reason. Drivers appreciate the commanding view of the road, which often translates to a feeling of greater safety and control. It's simply easier to see over traffic.

• Easier Entry and Exit: For many, particularly older drivers or those with mobility issues, sliding into a higher-riding crossover is far more comfortable than lowering oneself into a sedan.

• Increased Cargo Versatility: While sedans have trunks, crossovers and SUVs offer larger, more flexible cargo areas with rear hatch access. Fold-flat seats transform them into utility vehicles perfect for hauling groceries, sports gear, or furniture from IKEA.

• Perceived Safety: The sheer size and bulk of an SUV often give buyers a feeling of enhanced safety, even if modern sedans are incredibly safe due to advanced engineering and technology.

• "Cool Factor" and Lifestyle: Over time, SUVs became associated with an active, adventurous lifestyle. Marketing campaigns often depict them tackling rugged terrain or carrying families on exciting trips, making them aspirational vehicles.

Image from Mazda

The Sedan's Downfall: A Tale of Two Sides

As SUVs ascended, sedans found themselves in a difficult position. The video rightly notes that many manufacturers started to actively de-emphasize sedans in their lineup. For some, like Ford, this meant almost entirely abandoning the sedan segment in North America, opting instead to focus on their highly profitable truck and SUV divisions.

• Shrinking Market Share: As consumer preferences shifted, sales volumes for sedans declined. This made it less profitable for manufacturers to invest heavily in redesigning and marketing new sedan models.

• Internal Competition: Some could argue that manufacturers contributed to the sedan's demise by developing excellent, competitively priced crossovers that directly siphoned sales from their own sedan offerings. Why buy a Civic sedan when the HR-V (built on the same platform) offered more space and that desirable higher ride height for a similar price?

• Fuel Economy Neutralization: Historically, sedans held an advantage in fuel economy. However, advancements in engine technology, aerodynamics, and hybrid powertrains have significantly improved SUV fuel efficiency, narrowing this gap considerably. Many modern crossovers now offer MPG figures comparable to or even better than their sedan counterparts from a decade ago.

The Niche of the New Sedan: Performance and Luxury

Does this mean the sedan is completely dead? Not quite. While the mainstream, affordable sedan market has shrunk dramatically, there are still segments where sedans thrive:

• Luxury Sedans: Brands like Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, and Lexus continue to offer sophisticated sedans. Here, buyers prioritize driving dynamics, interior refinement, and brand prestige – qualities often best delivered in a lower-slung, more aerodynamic package.

• Performance Sedans: Enthusiasts still crave the precise handling and lower center of gravity that sedans often provide. The Lexus IS and BMW 3 Series, for example, signals that there's still a pulse in the sporty coupe/sedan segment for those who value driving engagement over pure utility.

• Budget Sedans: A few manufacturers, like Honda with the Civic and Accord, and Toyota with the Corolla and Camry, still offer strong sedan options that appeal to buyers looking for reliability and value without the bulk of an SUV. These cars often represent a more efficient and sometimes more engaging driving experience than their crossover counterparts.

Image from Top Speed

The Role of CAFE Standards

Enacted in 1975 to improve fuel efficiency after the Arab Oil Embargo, CAFE standards require car manufacturers to achieve a fleet-wide average fuel economy for the vehicles they sell. However, the key detail is that the standards are calculated separately for passenger cars and light trucks. This distinction created a loophole that incentivized automakers to shift production towards SUVs and trucks.

• The "Light Truck" Loophole: Historically, the CAFE standards for light trucks were less stringent than those for passenger cars. For a long time, the definition of a light truck included SUVs and minivans. This meant that a manufacturer could produce a large, less fuel-efficient SUV and a smaller, more efficient sedan, and the average for the "light truck" category would be easier to meet than the average for the "passenger car" category.

  
  

• The Footprint-Based System: More recently, CAFE regulations have evolved to a "footprint-based" system. This means a vehicle's specific fuel economy target is tied to its "footprint" (the area between its four tires). Essentially, the bigger the vehicle's footprint, the lower its required MPG. Since SUVs and trucks naturally have larger footprints than sedans, they are held to a less demanding standard. This system essentially rewards automakers for building larger vehicles, further encouraging the shift away from smaller sedans.

  
  

The Consequences of the Two-Tier System

This regulatory structure, combined with consumer demand for the utility and higher ride height of SUVs, created a perfect storm. Automakers found it more profitable and easier to meet government regulations by building and selling more SUVs and trucks.

• Shrinking Sedan Lineups: To meet their CAFE targets, some manufacturers, like Ford and General Motors, have all but abandoned the sedan market in the U.S. They've found it more efficient to focus their resources on the more popular and regulation-friendly SUV and truck segments. This leaves fewer sedan options for consumers, which in turn reinforces the market trend towards SUVs.

• Offsetting Fuel Economy Gains: While technology has made both sedans and SUVs more fuel-efficient over the decades, the dramatic rise in SUV sales has largely neutralized the overall fuel economy gains for the entire U.S. vehicle fleet. The average fuel economy of a sedan is still significantly better than that of a comparable SUV. When the majority of new car sales are fuel-thirsty trucks and SUVs, the national average MPG stagnates, even if individual vehicles are more efficient than their predecessors.

  
  

In short, while CAFE standards were designed to make cars more efficient, their two-tiered structure inadvertently created a powerful economic incentive for car companies to push larger, less fuel-efficient vehicles. This played a significant role in the demise of the traditional sedan in the American market.

Sources: Green Car Reports

nzero